National Layer

Evaluations & Stage Gates

A live view of every evaluation, stage gate decision and progression recommendation across the national accelerator ecosystem.

Evaluations completed

486

rolling 12 months

Evaluations in progress

across all DPs

Ventures evaluated this month

132

Average evaluation score

71%

Recommended for progression

Flagged for support

DPs with overdue evaluations

AI-assisted summaries

214

Bertie generated

Evaluation types across programmes

9 evaluation moments mapped across the national pathway

Intake evaluation

76%

Completed486Pending22

Programmes: All streams

Impact: Stream allocation

Readiness assessment

71%

Completed132Pending18

Programmes: NF, Pre-Accelerator

Impact: Mentor pairing

Mid-programme review

68%

Completed74Pending14

Programmes: All streams

Impact: Cohort intervention

Mentor evaluation

74%

Completed58Pending9

Programmes: All streams

Impact: Mentor reassignment

Funding readiness evaluation

65%

Completed91Pending12

Programmes: National Accelerator, Investor Readiness

Impact: Seed route

Seed readiness review

78%

Completed42Pending6

Programmes: Investor Readiness, National Accelerator

Impact: State support clearance

Investor readiness assessment

70%

Completed36Pending8

Programmes: Investor Readiness

Impact: Growth pipeline

Final progression panel

72%

Completed28Pending5

Programmes: National Accelerator, Specialist

Impact: Programme completion

Post-programme outcome review

80%

Completed21Pending3

Programmes: Alumni

Impact: Outcome reporting

Programme / stream evaluation roll-up

How each national stream is performing in evaluations

Programme / Stream	DPs	Evaluated	Avg score	Progression	At-risk	Consistency	AI summaries	Status
University Accelerators	9	125	46%	6	79	77%	76	Action
National Accelerator	5	93	67%	39	25	80%	60	Monitor
Regional Pre-Accelerators	10	124	52%	16	65	77%	71	Action
Specialist Accelerators	8	67	59%	15	25	77%	50	Action
Stream 4 / Investor Readiness	7	38	68%	10	8	80%	18	Monitor
National Youth Digital Accelerator	7	65	54%	2	29	79%	43	Action
University Spin-Out Programme	3	22	74%	6	2	82%	12	On track

Delivery partner evaluation comparison

Consistency, completeness and AI participation by DP

Delivery partner	Stream	Completed	Overdue	Avg score	Evidence	Evaluator part.	AI review	Progression	Governance
ESA BIC Greece / Patras Science Park	Specialist	8	0	70%	61%	92%	Pilot	2	Clear
Lefkippos Technology Park — NCSR Demokritos	Specialist	5	1	61%	60%	87%	Pilot	1	Clear
Corallia si-Cluster / InnoHub	Specialist	5	2	45%	53%	68%	Active	0	Review
Hellenic BioCluster	Specialist	7	1	49%	44%	64%	Pilot	0	Review
Blue Growth Piraeus	Specialist	7	0	65%	56%	76%	Limited	0	Clear
Pfizer Center for Digital Innovation	Specialist	7	0	64%	51%	66%	Limited	2	Clear
Thess INTEC	Specialist	7	0	61%	58%	90%	Active	1	Clear
CluBE — Cluster of Bioeconomy and Environment	Specialist	8	0	58%	54%	71%	Limited	1	Clear
ARCHIMEDES Center for Innovation & Entrepreneurship — NKUA	University Accelerators	14	3	37%	45%	63%	Pilot	0	Review
ACEin — Athens University of Economics and Business	University Accelerators	10	1	56%	50%	77%	Limited	0	Clear
NTUA Innovation & Entrepreneurship Unit	University Accelerators	11	1	51%	45%	72%	Limited	0	Review
AUTH Technology Transfer Office	University Accelerators	12	2	44%	47%	89%	Limited	0	Review
University of Patras TTO / Patras Science Park	University Accelerators	13	1	49%	52%	94%	Limited	0	Review
PRAXI Network / FORTH Technology Transfer	University Accelerators	7	2	46%	46%	82%	Pilot	0	Review
University of Ioannina / Epirus Science & Technology Park	University Accelerators	11	0	43%	44%	87%	Pilot	0	Review
Democritus University of Thrace Innovation Office	University Accelerators	8	2	39%	49%	61%	Pilot	0	Review
University of Thessaly / JOIST Innovation Park	University Accelerators	8	1	53%	50%	64%	Pilot	0	Review
OK!Thess	National Pre-Accelerator	12	1	63%	60%	69%	Limited	1	Clear
The Cube Athens	National Pre-Accelerator	11	0	50%	53%	69%	Active	1	Review
Athens Startup Business Incubator — THEA	National Pre-Accelerator	10	0	42%	55%	63%	Active	0	Review
Patras Science Park Incubation Programme	National Pre-Accelerator	9	2	46%	48%	80%	Pilot	1	Review
Science & Technology Park of Epirus	National Pre-Accelerator	10	1	43%	46%	89%	Pilot	0	Review
Science & Technology Park of Crete — STEP-C	National Pre-Accelerator	10	1	51%	46%	90%	Active	0	Review
JOIST Innovation Park	National Pre-Accelerator	9	1	58%	58%	91%	Limited	1	Clear
Thessaloniki Innovation Zone	National Pre-Accelerator	9	1	46%	50%	83%	Active	2	Review
Aegean Startup Hub	National Pre-Accelerator	9	1	58%	50%	78%	Active	2	Clear
Ionian University Innovation & Entrepreneurship Unit	National Pre-Accelerator	8	1	62%	53%	94%	Active	0	Clear
Junior Achievement Greece · Athens	National Digital Youth Accelerator	8	1	40%	48%	79%	Active	0	Review
Mindspace University Student Accelerator	National Digital Youth Accelerator	8	0	63%	57%	92%	Limited	0	Clear
Ennovation / ACEin Student Venture Track	National Digital Youth Accelerator	8	1	57%	60%	67%	Limited	0	Clear
JA Greece · Thessaloniki	National Digital Youth Accelerator	6	1	50%	56%	61%	Pilot	0	Review
University of Patras Student Startup Track	National Digital Youth Accelerator	6	1	59%	55%	62%	Pilot	0	Clear
University of Crete Student Ventures	National Digital Youth Accelerator	7	1	53%	50%	76%	Limited	0	Review
University of Thessaly Student Innovation Track	National Digital Youth Accelerator	7	0	57%	42%	73%	Active	0	Clear
HDBI AccelerateTT	Investor Readiness	2	1	73%	53%	75%	Pilot	2	Clear
Hellenic Business Angels Network	Investor Readiness	4	1	79%	57%	69%	Active	1	Clear
Marathon VC Seed Readiness	Investor Readiness	5	0	64%	52%	81%	Limited	2	Clear
VentureFriends Founder Office Hours	Investor Readiness	5	0	67%	42%	84%	Active	1	Clear
Uni.Fund University Investor Readiness	Investor Readiness	3	1	64%	63%	90%	Active	1	Clear
Metavallon Investment Readiness	Investor Readiness	5	0	63%	60%	91%	Active	2	Clear
Big Pi DeepTech Readiness	Investor Readiness	4	0	63%	45%	61%	Active	1	Clear
Elevate Greece National Startup Registry	National Accelerator	14	2	63%	64%	68%	Pilot	7	Review
egg — enter grow go	National Accelerator	17	1	65%	62%	90%	Active	4	Clear
Orange Grove Athens	National Accelerator	16	2	66%	62%	93%	Active	8	Review
Startup Greece National Platform	National Accelerator	10	2	71%	58%	95%	Pilot	9	Review
Corallia Innovation Hub	National Accelerator	15	2	70%	59%	83%	Limited	7	Review

Venture progression candidates

High-scoring ventures recommended for next-stage review

Venture	Founder	Delivery partner	Stage gate	Score	Evidence	Recommended next step	AI summary
Macedonia Software	Eleni Stavropoulou	Lefkippos Technology Park — NCSR Demokritos	Business model review	96	74%	Pass	Macedonia Software shows strong customer validation and credible market opportunity. Problem clarity and financial assumptions remain the primary gaps before progression review.
Ioannina Pay	Dimitris Stavropoulos	Orange Grove Athens	Funding readiness review	94	69%	Seed candidate	Ioannina Pay shows strong problem clarity and credible customer validation. Business model strength and impact potential remain the primary gaps before progression review.
Aegean Systems	Anastasia Ioannidou	Corallia si-Cluster / InnoHub	Funding readiness review	94	72%	Pass	Aegean Systems shows strong problem clarity and credible market opportunity. Customer validation and product readiness remain the primary gaps before progression review.
Heraklion Software	Petros Antoniou	Lefkippos Technology Park — NCSR Demokritos	Business model review	92	70%	Pass	Heraklion Software shows strong business model strength and credible funding readiness. Customer validation and financial assumptions remain the primary gaps before progression review.
Blue Robotics	Spyros Stavropoulos	Pfizer Center for Digital Innovation	Funding readiness review	92	66%	Seed candidate	Blue Robotics shows strong founder capability and credible business model strength. Funding readiness and solution fit remain the primary gaps before progression review.
Ioannina Bio	Kostas Ioannidis	OK!Thess	Problem-solution fit review	92	75%	Pass	Ioannina Bio shows strong problem clarity and credible customer validation. Solution fit and business model strength remain the primary gaps before progression review.
Patras Bio	Christina Vasileiou	Elevate Greece National Startup Registry	Final progression review	92	87%	Progression review	Patras Bio shows strong customer validation and credible founder capability. Financial assumptions and problem clarity remain the primary gaps before progression review.
Nova Health	Georgia Kostopoulou	Elevate Greece National Startup Registry	Funding readiness review	92	81%	Progression review	Nova Health shows strong problem clarity and credible customer validation. Product readiness and solution fit remain the primary gaps before progression review.
Pindos Nano	Niki Papadopoulou	Orange Grove Athens	Funding readiness review	92	86%	Progression review	Pindos Nano shows strong problem clarity and credible customer validation. Market opportunity and financial assumptions remain the primary gaps before progression review.
Crete Data	Christina Christodoulou	Startup Greece National Platform	Funding readiness review	92	72%	Pass	Crete Data shows strong customer validation and credible founder capability. Problem clarity and impact potential remain the primary gaps before progression review.
Piraeus Cloud	Christina Dimitriou	HDBI AccelerateTT	Final progression review	91	80%	Progression review	Piraeus Cloud shows strong problem clarity and credible customer validation. Impact potential and founder capability remain the primary gaps before progression review.
Ioannina Digital	Stavros Kouris	Hellenic Business Angels Network	Final progression review	91	77%	Progression review	Ioannina Digital shows strong customer validation and credible funding readiness. Financial assumptions and business model strength remain the primary gaps before progression review.

Bertie AI Evaluation Insights

National Evaluation Intelligence

Across current evaluations, customer validation evidence is the strongest predictor of progression readiness. Financial assumptions remain the most common weakness across Regional Pre-Accelerator ventures. HealthTech ventures show strong technical scores but weaker regulatory evidence.

Strengthen financial model templateAdd regulatory evidence checklistReview scoring consistency in PA DP3Progress 18 high-scoring ventures to funding-readiness review

Evaluation governance & audit trail

Auditable record of every evaluation decision

Date	Venture	Evaluation type	Evaluator	Delivery partner	Score	Decision	AI summary	Override / appeal	Audit note
2026-03-07	Odyssey Data	Intake evaluation	Andreea Dumitru	ESA BIC Greece / Patras Science Park	65	Specialist support	Yes	Override pending	AI summary cross-checked by panel chair.
2026-03-28	Hellas Software	Readiness assessment	Alexandru Dobre	ESA BIC Greece / Patras Science Park	44	Re-route	No	—	Manual review only.
2026-03-19	Aegean Logic	Mid-programme review	Maria Popa	ESA BIC Greece / Patras Science Park	73	Seed candidate	No	—	Manual review only.
2026-04-15	Larissa Health	Mentor evaluation	Mihai Stan	ESA BIC Greece / Patras Science Park	79	Pass	Yes	—	AI summary cross-checked by panel chair.
2026-04-03	Nestos Sense	Funding readiness evaluation	Ana Popescu	ESA BIC Greece / Patras Science Park	61	Needs support	Yes	—	AI summary cross-checked by panel chair.
2026-04-28	Mythos Data	Seed readiness review	Andrei Ionescu	ESA BIC Greece / Patras Science Park	85	Specialist support	Yes	—	AI summary cross-checked by panel chair.
2026-04-21	Macedonia Energy	Investor readiness assessment	Elena Stoica	ESA BIC Greece / Patras Science Park	60	Needs support	Yes	—	AI summary cross-checked by panel chair.
2026-03-09	Athena Robotics	Final progression panel	Cristian Gheorghe	ESA BIC Greece / Patras Science Park	71	Seed candidate	Yes	Override pending	AI summary cross-checked by panel chair.
2026-03-14	Macedonia Software	Post-programme outcome review	Andreea Dumitru	Lefkippos Technology Park — NCSR Demokritos	96	Pass	Yes	—	AI summary cross-checked by panel chair.
2026-03-20	Lumen Robotics	Intake evaluation	Andreea Dumitru	Lefkippos Technology Park — NCSR Demokritos	40	Re-route	Yes	—	AI summary cross-checked by panel chair.

Bertie allows MEDAT to see, compare and govern evaluations across the national accelerator ecosystem — turning programme judgement into structured, auditable and actionable intelligence.