Bertie coordinator instance · simulated data
National Accelerator·National flagship cohort delivered by a single national partner.SSIML Delivery Partner Performance
Stream coordinator console

National Accelerator

National Accelerator · 6 delivery partners

0
Ventures
0
On track
0
At-risk

Live across the stream

National Accelerator · Coordinator

Programme Evaluations

Oversee evaluations and stage gates across all delivery partners in this stream.

Evaluations completed
112
Pending
28
Overdue
9
Avg stream score
68%
Recommended for Seed
14
Ventures needing support
11
AI summaries
47
DPs with evaluation gaps
2

Evaluation stage gates

Seven stage-gate moments across the programme

Gate 1

Intake readiness review

Assessed0Avg score0%Passed0Needs support0Not ready0Overdue0
Gate 2

Problem-solution fit review

Assessed0Avg score0%Passed0Needs support0Not ready0Overdue0
Gate 3

Customer validation review

Assessed0Avg score0%Passed0Needs support0Not ready0Overdue0
Gate 4

Business model review

Assessed0Avg score0%Passed0Needs support0Not ready0Overdue0
Gate 5

MVP / product planning review

Assessed45Avg score53%Passed4Needs support26Not ready15Overdue5
Gate 6

Funding readiness review

Assessed22Avg score82%Passed21Needs support1Not ready0Overdue2
Gate 7

Final progression review

Assessed32Avg score66%Passed18Needs support7Not ready7Overdue2

Delivery partner evaluation status

Comparing the 6 delivery partners in this stream

Delivery partnerCompletedPendingOverdueAvg scoreProgressionEvidenceStatus
Start:up Slovenia113359%356%Review
Slovene Enterprise Fund133160%558%On track
SPIRIT Slovenia Startup Gateway124159%355%On track
Technology Park Ljubljana141176%560%On track
ABC Accelerator141167%160%On track
PODIM / Venture Factory122262%449%Review

Venture evaluations

Every venture in the stream, with score, evidence and recommendation

StartupFounderDPSectorStage gateScoreEvidenceRecommendation
Green PaySara GolobStart:up Slovenia
AgriTech
MVP / product planning review4674%Rework
Vesna HealthAndrej KorošecStart:up Slovenia
SaaS
MVP / product planning review4734%Rework
Soča TechTanja MlakarStart:up Slovenia
Consumer
MVP / product planning review5538%Needs support
Ljubljana NanoSimon KovačStart:up Slovenia
AgriTech
Final progression review5343%Rework
Gorenjska CloudMateja VidmarStart:up Slovenia
Hardware
MVP / product planning review6873%Specialist support
Drava DigitalMaja BožičStart:up Slovenia
AI
MVP / product planning review5972%Needs support
Green RoboticsŽiga ZupančičStart:up Slovenia
SaaS
MVP / product planning review7563%Specialist support
Katapult TechGregor VidmarStart:up Slovenia
SaaS
Final progression review7383%Specialist support
Ljubljana AIMateja KrajncStart:up Slovenia
AI
Funding readiness review8874%Pass
Vector DigitalMateja BožičStart:up Slovenia
AgriTech
Final progression review4631%Rework
LUI LogicMarko PotočnikStart:up Slovenia
AI
MVP / product planning review2826%Re-route
Kranj LogicJure TurkStart:up Slovenia
Hardware
Funding readiness review8544%Seed candidate
Primorska WorksBojan KorošecStart:up Slovenia
AgriTech
MVP / product planning review3162%Re-route
Primorska MobilityBojan KovačičStart:up Slovenia
HealthTech
Funding readiness review8486%Progression review
Pixel GridŽiga KovačStart:up Slovenia
Consumer
MVP / product planning review6552%Specialist support
Showing 115 of 99 ventures
Page 1 of 7

Evaluation criteria & scoring framework

Weighted criteria applied consistently across all delivery partners

Problem clarity

10%

Clarity, specificity and urgency of the problem.

Stream avg score63%

Customer validation

15%

Evidence of customer demand and pain.

Stream avg score69%

Market opportunity

10%

Size, growth and accessibility of target market.

Stream avg score62%

Solution fit

10%

How well the solution addresses the problem.

Stream avg score63%

Founder capability

10%

Team strength, domain depth and resilience.

Stream avg score62%

Business model strength

10%

Revenue logic, unit economics, repeatability.

Stream avg score63%

Product readiness

10%

MVP maturity and shipping cadence.

Stream avg score63%

Financial assumptions

10%

Credibility of forecasts and funding plan.

Stream avg score63%

Funding readiness

10%

Investor materials, narrative, governance.

Stream avg score63%

Impact potential

5%

Economic, climate or societal contribution.

Stream avg score62%
Bertie AI Evaluation Support

National Accelerator Evaluation Support

Across the National Accelerator stream, ventures are strongest on problem clarity and weakest on financial assumptions. Two delivery partners have the highest number of ventures requiring rework before funding-readiness review.

Run shared finance clinicAssign business model mentorsRequest updated customer evidenceMove 6 ventures to progression panelFlag 3 ventures for specialist support

Evaluation report to Management Layer

Compile and send a stream evaluation summary to the National Layer

Bertie helps Stream Coordinators manage programme stage gates consistently across delivery partners, while using AI to summarise evidence, identify gaps and recommend the next best intervention for each venture.

Powered by Bertie logo