Specialist
Specialist Accelerator · 8 delivery partners
Live across the stream
Programme Evaluations
Oversee evaluations and stage gates across all delivery partners in this stream.
Evaluation stage gates
Seven stage-gate moments across the programme
Intake readiness review
Problem-solution fit review
Customer validation review
Business model review
MVP / product planning review
Funding readiness review
Final progression review
Delivery partner evaluation status
Comparing the 8 delivery partners in this stream
| Delivery partner | Completed | Pending | Overdue | Avg score | Progression | Evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology Park Ljubljana BALI Accelerator | 9 | 0 | 0 | 62% | 2 | 55% | On track |
| Katapult Hardware Accelerator | 5 | 3 | 1 | 68% | 1 | 63% | On track |
| LUI DeepTech Venture Builder | 5 | 2 | 2 | 44% | 1 | 52% | Review |
| Jožef Stefan Institute DeepTech Track | 7 | 0 | 1 | 49% | 0 | 44% | Review |
| EIT Health RIS Hub Slovenia | 7 | 1 | 0 | 65% | 0 | 56% | On track |
| ABC Smart Cities & Mobility Track | 7 | 1 | 0 | 64% | 2 | 51% | On track |
| Primorska Blue Economy Track | 7 | 1 | 0 | 61% | 1 | 58% | On track |
| Green Transition Track Celje | 8 | 0 | 0 | 58% | 1 | 54% | On track |
Venture evaluations
Every venture in the stream, with score, evidence and recommendation
| Startup | Founder | DP | Sector | Stage gate | Score | Evidence | Recommendation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Podim Data | Andrej Turk | Technology Park Ljubljana BALI Accelerator | Investment readiness and global commercialisation | MVP / product planning review | 65 | 37% | Specialist support | |
| Ljubljana Software | Žiga Kos | Technology Park Ljubljana BALI Accelerator | Investment readiness and global commercialisation | MVP / product planning review | 44 | 38% | Re-route | |
| Triglav Logic | Luka Kovačič | Technology Park Ljubljana BALI Accelerator | Investment readiness and global commercialisation | Funding readiness review | 73 | 60% | Seed candidate | |
| Celje Health | Sara Golob | Technology Park Ljubljana BALI Accelerator | Investment readiness and global commercialisation | Business model review | 79 | 75% | Pass | |
| Katapult Sense | Andrej Korošec | Technology Park Ljubljana BALI Accelerator | Investment readiness and global commercialisation | Customer validation review | 61 | 56% | Needs support | |
| Pixel Data | Tanja Mlakar | Technology Park Ljubljana BALI Accelerator | Investment readiness and global commercialisation | Business model review | 85 | 54% | Specialist support | |
| Sava Energy | Simon Kovač | Technology Park Ljubljana BALI Accelerator | Investment readiness and global commercialisation | Customer validation review | 60 | 76% | Needs support | |
| Maribor Robotics | Mateja Vidmar | Technology Park Ljubljana BALI Accelerator | Investment readiness and global commercialisation | Funding readiness review | 71 | 75% | Seed candidate | |
| Drava Software | Maja Božič | Katapult Hardware Accelerator | Hardware and industrial technology | Business model review | 96 | 74% | Pass | |
| Nimbus Robotics | Žiga Zupančič | Katapult Hardware Accelerator | Hardware and industrial technology | MVP / product planning review | 40 | 53% | Re-route | |
| Podim Cloud | Gregor Vidmar | Katapult Hardware Accelerator | Hardware and industrial technology | Funding readiness review | 78 | 65% | Seed candidate | |
| Pomurje Cloud | Mateja Krajnc | Katapult Hardware Accelerator | Hardware and industrial technology | Customer validation review | 47 | 65% | Rework | |
| Sava Systems | Mateja Božič | Katapult Hardware Accelerator | Hardware and industrial technology | Customer validation review | 57 | 62% | Needs support | |
| Gorenjska Robotics | Marko Potočnik | Katapult Hardware Accelerator | Hardware and industrial technology | Customer validation review | 24 | 32% | Re-route | |
| Kranj Software | Jure Turk | Katapult Hardware Accelerator | Hardware and industrial technology | Business model review | 92 | 70% | Pass |
Evaluation criteria & scoring framework
Weighted criteria applied consistently across all delivery partners
Problem clarity
Clarity, specificity and urgency of the problem.
Customer validation
Evidence of customer demand and pain.
Market opportunity
Size, growth and accessibility of target market.
Solution fit
How well the solution addresses the problem.
Founder capability
Team strength, domain depth and resilience.
Business model strength
Revenue logic, unit economics, repeatability.
Product readiness
MVP maturity and shipping cadence.
Financial assumptions
Credibility of forecasts and funding plan.
Funding readiness
Investor materials, narrative, governance.
Impact potential
Economic, climate or societal contribution.
Specialist Evaluation Support
Across the Specialist stream, ventures are strongest on problem clarity and weakest on financial assumptions. Two delivery partners have the highest number of ventures requiring rework before funding-readiness review.
Evaluation report to Management Layer
Compile and send a stream evaluation summary to the National Layer
Bertie helps Stream Coordinators manage programme stage gates consistently across delivery partners, while using AI to summarise evidence, identify gaps and recommend the next best intervention for each venture.
