Investor Readiness
Investor Readiness Stream · 5 delivery partners
Live across the stream
Programme Evaluations
Oversee evaluations and stage gates across all delivery partners in this stream.
Evaluation stage gates
Seven stage-gate moments across the programme
Intake readiness review
Problem-solution fit review
Customer validation review
Business model review
MVP / product planning review
Funding readiness review
Final progression review
Delivery partner evaluation status
Comparing the 5 delivery partners in this stream
| Delivery partner | Completed | Pending | Overdue | Avg score | Progression | Evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Techcelerator Investment Readiness | 5 | 0 | 1 | 62% | 1 | 61% | On track |
| SeedBlink Academy / Investor Readiness | 5 | 1 | 0 | 77% | 2 | 60% | On track |
| Early Game Ventures Office Hours | 5 | 0 | 1 | 64% | 1 | 52% | On track |
| GapMinder Venture Readiness | 3 | 2 | 0 | 74% | 0 | 64% | On track |
| ROStartup Investor Readiness Clinic | 3 | 1 | 1 | 69% | 1 | 57% | On track |
Venture evaluations
Every venture in the stream, with score, evidence and recommendation
| Startup | Founder | DP | Sector | Stage gate | Score | Evidence | Recommendation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oltenia Logic | George Stoica | Techcelerator Investment Readiness | CleanTech | MVP / product planning review | 63 | 75% | Needs support | |
| Dacia Sense | Ana Rusu | Techcelerator Investment Readiness | Marketplace | Final progression review | 58 | 63% | Needs support | |
| Spherik Cloud | Elena Neagu | Techcelerator Investment Readiness | FinTech | Final progression review | 52 | 42% | Rework | |
| Transilvania Tech | Florin Popa | Techcelerator Investment Readiness | FinTech | MVP / product planning review | 62 | 65% | Needs support | |
| Lumen Works | Ștefan Popescu | Techcelerator Investment Readiness | AgriTech | Funding readiness review | 94 | 80% | Progression review | |
| Constanța Grid | Ionuț Munteanu | SeedBlink Academy / Investor Readiness | HealthTech | Funding readiness review | 85 | 90% | Progression review | |
| Muntenia Digital | Alina Marin | SeedBlink Academy / Investor Readiness | Hardware | Final progression review | 93 | 71% | Pass | |
| Pixel AI | Irina Stoica | SeedBlink Academy / Investor Readiness | EdTech | Final progression review | 71 | 49% | Specialist support | |
| Craiova Data | Simona Popescu | SeedBlink Academy / Investor Readiness | FinTech | MVP / product planning review | 63 | 33% | Needs support | |
| Timișoara Robotics | Ana Neagu | SeedBlink Academy / Investor Readiness | Hardware | Final progression review | 59 | 36% | Needs support | |
| Carpathia Digital | Oana Munteanu | Early Game Ventures Office Hours | SaaS | Final progression review | 33 | 20% | Re-route | |
| Constanța Labs | Vlad Dobre | Early Game Ventures Office Hours | SaaS | Final progression review | 82 | 65% | Specialist support | |
| Rubik Works | Radu Stan | Early Game Ventures Office Hours | Marketplace | Final progression review | 24 | 61% | Re-route | |
| Constanța Labs | Cătălin Gheorghe | Early Game Ventures Office Hours | Consumer | Funding readiness review | 88 | 81% | Progression review | |
| Cluj Sense | Ionuț Neagu | Early Game Ventures Office Hours | FinTech | Funding readiness review | 66 | 40% | Specialist support |
Evaluation criteria & scoring framework
Weighted criteria applied consistently across all delivery partners
Problem clarity
Clarity, specificity and urgency of the problem.
Customer validation
Evidence of customer demand and pain.
Market opportunity
Size, growth and accessibility of target market.
Solution fit
How well the solution addresses the problem.
Founder capability
Team strength, domain depth and resilience.
Business model strength
Revenue logic, unit economics, repeatability.
Product readiness
MVP maturity and shipping cadence.
Financial assumptions
Credibility of forecasts and funding plan.
Funding readiness
Investor materials, narrative, governance.
Impact potential
Economic, climate or societal contribution.
Investor Readiness Evaluation Support
Across the Investor Readiness stream, ventures are strongest on problem clarity and weakest on financial assumptions. Two delivery partners have the highest number of ventures requiring rework before funding-readiness review.
Evaluation report to Management Layer
Compile and send a stream evaluation summary to the National Layer
Bertie helps Stream Coordinators manage programme stage gates consistently across delivery partners, while using AI to summarise evidence, identify gaps and recommend the next best intervention for each venture.
