National Layer
Evaluations & Stage Gates
A live view of every evaluation, stage gate decision and progression recommendation across the national accelerator ecosystem.
Evaluations completed
486
rolling 12 months
Evaluations in progress
74
across all DPs
Ventures evaluated this month
132
Average evaluation score
71%
Recommended for progression
58
Flagged for support
34
DPs with overdue evaluations
6
AI-assisted summaries
214
Bertie generated
Evaluation types across programmes
9 evaluation moments mapped across the national pathway
Intake evaluation
76%
Completed486Pending22
Programmes: All streams
Impact: Stream allocation
Readiness assessment
71%
Completed132Pending18
Programmes: NF, Pre-Accelerator
Impact: Mentor pairing
Mid-programme review
68%
Completed74Pending14
Programmes: All streams
Impact: Cohort intervention
Mentor evaluation
74%
Completed58Pending9
Programmes: All streams
Impact: Mentor reassignment
Funding readiness evaluation
65%
Completed91Pending12
Programmes: National Accelerator, Investor Readiness
Impact: Seed route
Seed readiness review
78%
Completed42Pending6
Programmes: Investor Readiness, National Accelerator
Impact: State support clearance
Investor readiness assessment
70%
Completed36Pending8
Programmes: Investor Readiness
Impact: Growth pipeline
Final progression panel
72%
Completed28Pending5
Programmes: National Accelerator, Specialist
Impact: Programme completion
Post-programme outcome review
80%
Completed21Pending3
Programmes: Alumni
Impact: Outcome reporting
Programme / stream evaluation roll-up
How each national stream is performing in evaluations
| Programme / Stream | DPs | Evaluated | Avg score | Progression | At-risk | Consistency | AI summaries | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Accelerators | 7 | 105 | 48% | 5 | 65 | 78% | 66 | Action |
| National Accelerator | 1 | 21 | 71% | 8 | 3 | 83% | 13 | Monitor |
| Regional Pre-Accelerators | 5 | 59 | 54% | 9 | 29 | 77% | 35 | Action |
| Specialist Accelerators | 6 | 51 | 59% | 10 | 18 | 78% | 35 | Action |
| Stream 4 / Investor Readiness | 3 | 15 | 69% | 5 | 2 | 83% | 11 | Monitor |
| National Youth Digital Accelerator | 4 | 38 | 50% | 8 | 22 | 76% | 22 | Action |
| University Spin-Out Programme | 3 | 22 | 74% | 6 | 2 | 82% | 12 | On track |
Delivery partner evaluation comparison
Consistency, completeness and AI participation by DP
| Delivery partner | Stream | Completed | Overdue | Avg score | Evidence | Evaluator part. | AI review | Progression | Governance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESA BIC Prague | Specialist | 8 | 0 | 65% | 57% | 92% | Pilot | 2 | Clear |
| CERN Venture Connect | Specialist | 5 | 1 | 67% | 62% | 87% | Pilot | 1 | Clear |
| Czech HealthTech Track (Brno) | Specialist | 5 | 2 | 42% | 52% | 68% | Active | 1 | Review |
| ENERN Climate Track | Specialist | 7 | 1 | 49% | 44% | 64% | Pilot | 0 | Review |
| Prague.AI Centre | Specialist | 7 | 0 | 65% | 56% | 76% | Limited | 0 | Clear |
| IT4Innovations Ostrava | Specialist | 7 | 0 | 64% | 51% | 66% | Limited | 2 | Clear |
| InQbay — ČVUT (CTU Prague) | University Accelerators | 16 | 0 | 42% | 47% | 63% | Pilot | 0 | Review |
| xPORT VŠE | University Accelerators | 14 | 2 | 52% | 48% | 77% | Limited | 0 | Review |
| JIC STARCUBE (Brno) | University Accelerators | 13 | 1 | 52% | 50% | 72% | Limited | 0 | Review |
| BIC — VUT Brno | University Accelerators | 11 | 0 | 55% | 54% | 89% | Limited | 0 | Clear |
| Masaryk University Incubator | University Accelerators | 8 | 3 | 44% | 40% | 94% | Limited | 0 | Review |
| Point One — ČZU Prague | University Accelerators | 10 | 0 | 49% | 48% | 82% | Pilot | 0 | Review |
| Palacký University Incubator | University Accelerators | 10 | 1 | 43% | 52% | 87% | Pilot | 0 | Review |
| SIC — Central Bohemian Innovation Centre | National Pre-Accelerator | 10 | 1 | 55% | 50% | 69% | Limited | 0 | Clear |
| ICUK — Innovation Centre Ústí Region | National Pre-Accelerator | 10 | 1 | 41% | 43% | 69% | Active | 0 | Review |
| TIC — Technology Innovation Centre Zlín | National Pre-Accelerator | 10 | 1 | 63% | 57% | 63% | Active | 1 | Clear |
| JVTP — South Bohemian Science & Technology Park | National Pre-Accelerator | 10 | 2 | 53% | 50% | 80% | Pilot | 0 | Review |
| Lipo.ink Innovation Hub Liberec | National Pre-Accelerator | 9 | 1 | 59% | 47% | 89% | Pilot | 1 | Clear |
| Digitální mládežnický akcelerátor · Praha | National Digital Youth Accelerator | 7 | 0 | 51% | 45% | 79% | Active | 0 | Review |
| Digitální mládežnický akcelerátor · Brno | National Digital Youth Accelerator | 9 | 0 | 50% | 51% | 92% | Limited | 0 | Review |
| Digitální mládežnický akcelerátor · Ostrava | National Digital Youth Accelerator | 6 | 1 | 55% | 54% | 67% | Limited | 0 | Clear |
| Digitální mládežnický akcelerátor · Plzeň | National Digital Youth Accelerator | 9 | 0 | 45% | 47% | 61% | Pilot | 0 | Review |
| Investor Readiness Praha | Investor Readiness | 3 | 1 | 72% | 56% | 75% | Pilot | 1 | Clear |
| Czech Business Angels Network | Investor Readiness | 5 | 0 | 66% | 48% | 69% | Active | 1 | Clear |
| DEPO Ventures Lab | Investor Readiness | 4 | 0 | 69% | 60% | 81% | Limited | 0 | Clear |
| CzechInvest Technology Incubation | National Accelerator | 15 | 3 | 71% | 62% | 68% | Pilot | 7 | Review |
Venture progression candidates
High-scoring ventures recommended for next-stage review
| Venture | Founder | Delivery partner | Stage gate | Score | Evidence | Recommended next step | AI summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatra Software | Tereza Pokorná | CERN Venture Connect | Business model review | 96 | 74% | Pass | Tatra Software shows strong customer validation and credible market opportunity. Problem clarity and financial assumptions remain the primary gaps before progression review. |
| Šumava Energo | Adéla Procházková | xPORT VŠE | Problem-solution fit review | 95 | 75% | Pass | Šumava Energo shows strong problem clarity and credible solution fit. Customer validation and founder capability remain the primary gaps before progression review. |
| Mendel Energo | Filip Svoboda | CzechInvest Technology Incubation | Funding readiness review | 94 | 88% | Progression review | Mendel Energo shows strong customer validation and credible solution fit. Market opportunity and problem clarity remain the primary gaps before progression review. |
| Křišťál Software | Jiří Kratochvíl | CERN Venture Connect | Business model review | 92 | 70% | Pass | Křišťál Software shows strong business model strength and credible funding readiness. Customer validation and financial assumptions remain the primary gaps before progression review. |
| Vega Robotics | Vojtěch Růžička | IT4Innovations Ostrava | Funding readiness review | 92 | 66% | Seed candidate | Vega Robotics shows strong founder capability and credible business model strength. Funding readiness and solution fit remain the primary gaps before progression review. |
| Labe OS | Petra Novotná | Digitální mládežnický akcelerátor · Ostrava | Business model review | 92 | 93% | Pass | Labe OS shows strong market opportunity and credible business model strength. Funding readiness and financial assumptions remain the primary gaps before progression review. |
| Berounka Robotics | David Horák | Investor Readiness Praha | Final progression review | 92 | 85% | Progression review | Berounka Robotics shows strong market opportunity and credible solution fit. Founder capability and product readiness remain the primary gaps before progression review. |
| Zlatý OS | Michal Kovář | Digitální mládežnický akcelerátor · Plzeň | Problem-solution fit review | 91 | 83% | Pass | Zlatý OS shows strong problem clarity and credible market opportunity. Founder capability and funding readiness remain the primary gaps before progression review. |
| Křišťál Labs | Vojtěch Černý | Investor Readiness Praha | Funding readiness review | 91 | 74% | Pass | Křišťál Labs shows strong business model strength and credible funding readiness. Impact potential and problem clarity remain the primary gaps before progression review. |
| Morava Tech | Filip Dvořák | BIC — VUT Brno | Intake readiness review | 90 | 89% | Pass | Morava Tech shows strong problem clarity and credible founder capability. Impact potential and business model strength remain the primary gaps before progression review. |
| Lumen Health | Filip Růžička | CzechInvest Technology Incubation | Funding readiness review | 89 | 85% | Progression review | Lumen Health shows strong customer validation and credible funding readiness. Problem clarity and business model strength remain the primary gaps before progression review. |
| Nimbus Data | Vojtěch Černý | Digitální mládežnický akcelerátor · Brno | Business model review | 88 | 70% | Pass | Nimbus Data shows strong solution fit and credible funding readiness. Problem clarity and product readiness remain the primary gaps before progression review. |
Bertie AI Evaluation Insights
National Evaluation Intelligence
Across current evaluations, customer validation evidence is the strongest predictor of progression readiness. Financial assumptions remain the most common weakness across Regional Pre-Accelerator ventures. HealthTech ventures show strong technical scores but weaker regulatory evidence.
Strengthen financial model templateAdd regulatory evidence checklistReview scoring consistency in PA DP3Progress 18 high-scoring ventures to funding-readiness review
Evaluation governance & audit trail
Auditable record of every evaluation decision
| Date | Venture | Evaluation type | Evaluator | Delivery partner | Score | Decision | AI summary | Override / appeal | Audit note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-07 | Kometa Data | Intake evaluation | Martin Černý | ESA BIC Prague | 65 | Specialist support | Yes | Override pending | AI summary cross-checked by panel chair. |
| 2026-03-28 | Sázava Software | Readiness assessment | Lucie Procházková | ESA BIC Prague | 44 | Re-route | No | — | Manual review only. |
| 2026-03-19 | Vltava Logic | Mid-programme review | Tomáš Dvořák | ESA BIC Prague | 73 | Seed candidate | No | — | Manual review only. |
| 2026-04-15 | Ostrava Health | Mentor evaluation | Eliška Novotná | ESA BIC Prague | 79 | Pass | Yes | — | AI summary cross-checked by panel chair. |
| 2026-04-03 | Avion Sense | Funding readiness evaluation | Jakub Novák | ESA BIC Prague | 61 | Needs support | Yes | — | AI summary cross-checked by panel chair. |
| 2026-04-28 | Stříbro Data | Seed readiness review | Tereza Svobodová | ESA BIC Prague | 85 | Specialist support | Yes | — | AI summary cross-checked by panel chair. |
| 2026-04-21 | Tatra Energo | Investor readiness assessment | Ondřej Veselý | ESA BIC Prague | 60 | Needs support | Yes | — | AI summary cross-checked by panel chair. |
| 2026-03-09 | Morava Robotics | Final progression panel | Karolína Horáková | ESA BIC Prague | 71 | Seed candidate | Yes | Override pending | AI summary cross-checked by panel chair. |
| 2026-03-14 | Tatra Software | Post-programme outcome review | Martin Černý | CERN Venture Connect | 96 | Pass | Yes | — | AI summary cross-checked by panel chair. |
| 2026-03-20 | Jantar Robotics | Intake evaluation | Martin Černý | CERN Venture Connect | 40 | Re-route | Yes | — | AI summary cross-checked by panel chair. |
Bertie allows CzechInvest to see, compare and govern evaluations across the national accelerator ecosystem — turning programme judgement into structured, auditable and actionable intelligence.
