National Pre-Accelerator
National Pre-Accelerator · 5 delivery partners
Live across the stream
Programme Evaluations
Oversee evaluations and stage gates across all delivery partners in this stream.
Evaluation stage gates
Seven stage-gate moments across the programme
Intake readiness review
Problem-solution fit review
Customer validation review
Business model review
MVP / product planning review
Funding readiness review
Final progression review
Delivery partner evaluation status
Comparing the 5 delivery partners in this stream
| Delivery partner | Completed | Pending | Overdue | Avg score | Progression | Evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIC — Central Bohemian Innovation Centre | 10 | 1 | 1 | 55% | 0 | 50% | On track |
| ICUK — Innovation Centre Ústí Region | 10 | 1 | 1 | 41% | 0 | 43% | Review |
| TIC — Technology Innovation Centre Zlín | 10 | 1 | 1 | 63% | 1 | 57% | On track |
| JVTP — South Bohemian Science & Technology Park | 10 | 0 | 2 | 53% | 0 | 50% | Review |
| Lipo.ink Innovation Hub Liberec | 9 | 1 | 1 | 59% | 1 | 47% | On track |
Venture evaluations
Every venture in the stream, with score, evidence and recommendation
| Startup | Founder | DP | Sector | Stage gate | Score | Evidence | Recommendation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zlatý Tech | Filip Růžička | SIC — Central Bohemian Innovation Centre | HealthTech | MVP / product planning review | 30 | 26% | Re-route | |
| Stříbro Nano | Tomáš Kratochvíl | SIC — Central Bohemian Innovation Centre | HealthTech | Customer validation review | 49 | 56% | Rework | |
| Janus Tech | Jakub Fiala | SIC — Central Bohemian Innovation Centre | AgriTech | Funding readiness review | 64 | 74% | Needs support | |
| Říp Data | Vojtěch Veselý | SIC — Central Bohemian Innovation Centre | AI | Problem-solution fit review | 40 | 25% | Re-route | |
| Vega OS | Jan Veselý | SIC — Central Bohemian Innovation Centre | AgriTech | Business model review | 86 | 88% | Pass | |
| Morava Sense | Lucie Procházková | SIC — Central Bohemian Innovation Centre | CleanTech | Business model review | 93 | 67% | Specialist support | |
| Orlík Logic | Filip Procházka | SIC — Central Bohemian Innovation Centre | AI | Customer validation review | 53 | 49% | Rework | |
| Avion Software | Ondřej Fiala | SIC — Central Bohemian Innovation Centre | EdTech | Customer validation review | 48 | 66% | Rework | |
| Praha Cloud | Petr Růžička | SIC — Central Bohemian Innovation Centre | EdTech | Problem-solution fit review | 83 | 42% | Specialist support | |
| Krkonoš Bio | Jakub Dvořák | SIC — Central Bohemian Innovation Centre | Marketplace | Customer validation review | 20 | 22% | Re-route | |
| Morava Energo | Natálie Kovářová | SIC — Central Bohemian Innovation Centre | EdTech | MVP / product planning review | 34 | 26% | Re-route | |
| Lumen Works | Jiří Veselý | ICUK — Innovation Centre Ústí Region | EdTech | Problem-solution fit review | 33 | 32% | Re-route | |
| Janus Digital | Zuzana Nováková | ICUK — Innovation Centre Ústí Region | AI | Problem-solution fit review | 63 | 48% | Needs support | |
| Stříbro Mobilita | David Procházka | ICUK — Innovation Centre Ústí Region | Consumer | Customer validation review | 41 | 37% | Re-route | |
| Morava Digital | Natálie Černá | ICUK — Innovation Centre Ústí Region | EdTech | MVP / product planning review | 17 | 18% | Re-route |
Evaluation criteria & scoring framework
Weighted criteria applied consistently across all delivery partners
Problem clarity
Clarity, specificity and urgency of the problem.
Customer validation
Evidence of customer demand and pain.
Market opportunity
Size, growth and accessibility of target market.
Solution fit
How well the solution addresses the problem.
Founder capability
Team strength, domain depth and resilience.
Business model strength
Revenue logic, unit economics, repeatability.
Product readiness
MVP maturity and shipping cadence.
Financial assumptions
Credibility of forecasts and funding plan.
Funding readiness
Investor materials, narrative, governance.
Impact potential
Economic, climate or societal contribution.
National Pre-Accelerator Evaluation Support
Across the National Pre-Accelerator stream, ventures are strongest on problem clarity and weakest on financial assumptions. Two delivery partners have the highest number of ventures requiring rework before funding-readiness review.
Evaluation report to Management Layer
Compile and send a stream evaluation summary to the National Layer
Bertie helps Stream Coordinators manage programme stage gates consistently across delivery partners, while using AI to summarise evidence, identify gaps and recommend the next best intervention for each venture.
